On valuing networks and dissonance. An interview with David Stark

David Stark is Arthur Lehman Professor of Sociology and International Affairs at Columbia University where he directs the Center on Organizational Innovation. His most recent book, The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life, was published by Princeton University Press in 2009. In this interview, we talked about epistemology, economic sociology, music and dissonance at the European University Institute, where David spent some time as Fernand Braudel Fellow in May 2012. Here I reproduce some highlights of that conversation.

P1. You, like other economic sociologists, have been particularly interested on pragmatism as a new epistemology for social research. I wonder if economic sociologists are looking for new classics like Dewey or William James replacing Durkheim or Weber. What is that you find interesting in pragmatism for your economic sociology?

R1. [2.37 mins.]  

P2. I find the focus on “situations” very interesting, however I wonder if this “situationist” turn  makes sociology a descriptive rather than an explicative discipline, since situations are somehow always different and contingent and, therefore, impossible to generalize or to model. Do you agree  with that opinion or you think is situations can be modeled?

R2. [2.54 mins.] 

P3. Which approaches or concepts have been especially useful for making sense of your etnographic research? And more specifically, how important were Boltanski’s and Thévenot’s orders of worths in your work?

R3. [4.21 mins.] 

P4. You have used quite different types of methods in your research. Have you tried to mix methods, for instance network analysis and etnography? Do you think such a combination is useful or desirable?

R4. [3.29 mins.] 

P5. I would like to talk about two concepts that I find quite interesting in your work: uncertainty and dissonance. My impression with uncertainty, is that you use the concept in a different way than other economic sociologists that are mainly concerned about how to “reduce uncertainty”, paying attention to the role of instutions, coordination devices or conventions. Unlike them, you conceive uncertainty more like an opportunity. Would you agree with this vision?

R5. [2.15 mins.] 

P6. And what about dissonance? I like the concept because it comes from music, but I wonder if you use it only methaporically and how different is dissonance from previous concepts such as diversity?

R6. [4.30 mins.] 

P7. And, to finish, do you think your situationist economic sociology could bring new perspectives to more political economy type of concerns such as the study of economic crises?

R7. [1.35 mins.] 

Stefano Palestini

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Trackbacks

  • […] entrevistado de la semana pasada, David Stark, recomienda a los lectores de este blog sus “silent lectures” o clases silenciosas. Una […]

  • By Feliz 2014 | Estudios de la Economía on January 6, 2014 at 11:21 pm

    […] muy buenas entrevistas (con D. Beunza, G. Eyal, T. Mitchell, Y. Millo, M. A. Garretón, C. Han, D. Stark, P. du Gay, P. Mirowski y P. Wagner). Hemos continuado la colaboración con los amigos de […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: